Thursday, December 29, 2016

Rogue One: Whites at War with Ourselves


Cinematic trailers for the next movies are often more revealing than the movie itself for the moral universe of Hollywood. Before the opening spaceship shot of Rogue One, we were treated to a jump-cut sequence of multiracial families and half Negroid kids yelling cheerfully in suburban houses, followed up by a mixed-race man waving a book and repeating “Love, love, love, love, love!” at the top of his lungs in complete tearful hysterics. Of course, it was a Google advert. Advertising what? Google. Google is Love, Google is Life. Bookmark Counter-Currents today because the search engine rankings are will be painfully full of liberal spam to “fake news” ham in a matter of months.
Following breathless mania for métissage, the next trailer for Hidden Figures explained in great detail that America’s space program would have failed utterly if it wasn’t for the civil rights struggle of Negro women mathematicians within NASA. Based on an “Untold” “True” Story that has only remained “Untold” because the Hollywood Truth of it hadn’t been invented yet. And then we had 1950s civil rights struggle Negroes retold by Denzel Washington as family drama. 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, goyim. To break the 95% ceiling you have to be a Holocaust movie or have a homosexual negro (Moonlight, 98%).
After the battering of grievance propaganda, the trailer for The Space Between Us unwound its light sci-fi, white boy on Mars falls for white girl on Earth narrative. While the past is full of bitter and entitled darkies, in the future, everyone in white, and life is easy. Donald Trump’s America has clearly made the first steps to becoming galactic after solving the civil rights issue by simply removing all the blacks. Nonthreatening indie rock music and teen romance blended subtly with imagery of clean spacesuits, bright classrooms, and the landscapes of a high-tech humanity living harmoniously with nature. I like to think that one day, that boy earned the honor of joining the Imperial Storm Troopers.
votar

El gran mapa de los estereotipos europeos

Amigos europeos: ¿Aún no saben ustedes a quién votar mañana? No se preocupen. 
Procedemos a hacer un informe exprés sobre la situación continental para que se aclaren. País Vasco: etarras. España, Italia y Portugal: vagos compulsivos. Albano-kosovares: ladrones. Turquía: moros. Alemania: nazis. Mallorca: alemanes desnudos. Y así sucesivamente. ¿Lo ven ustedes ahora más claro?

Antes de que la fiscalía actúe de oficio contra este artículo por decirbarbaridades, toca aclarar que estamos hablando de uno de los proyectos culturales más interesante surgidos en Europa en los últimos tiempos: el Atlas de los Prejuicios del diseñador búlgaro Yanki Tsvetskov, que ha dado la vuelta al concepto tradicional de mapa al dividir los países en función de los estereotipos que pesan sobre cada lugar.

El proyecto, que ha generado ya dos libros que se venden como rosquillas en países como Alemania, Inglaterra y España, arrancó hace cinco años, tras el estallido de un quilombo europeo que le sonará a usted de algo: la crisis política entre Ucrania y Rusia. Tsvetskov empezó entonces a crear mapas europeos y mundiales buscando las cosquillas a los estereotipos; es decir, a los prejuicios que limitan la mirada de nuestros vecinos. El resultado es una bomba satírica de alto voltaje.

Dado que Tsvetskov lleva media década buceando en los prejuicios europeos,  parece el hombre adecuado para señalar, a pocas horas de la votación electoral, cuáles son los estereotipos históricos más arraigados: 
votar

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

What the 'Perfect' Female Body Looks Like Around the World - Como luce El "Cuerpo Perfecto" a través del mundo


From Marilyn Monroe to Jennifer Aniston, celebs and models -- and magazine editors and fashion designers, of course -- have set beauty standards for American women. But what we've perceived as aspirational isn't necessarily what our sisters in other countries believe to be their ideal. Hence why a new study strove to illustrate various perceptions of beauty all over the world.


U.K. online pharmacy Superdrug Online Doctors commissioned 18 graphic artists to Photoshop the same exact female form into a shape that their culture would find attractive. Their goal: "To better understand potentially unrealistic standards of beauty and to see how such pressures vary around the world," according to their press release.
And they focused on female designers, because they wanted "a woman's view of what her culture finds attractive and to understand more about the pressures they face. However, in order to get entries from more countries, we accepted contributions from four men with the caveat that they first seek input from women and base their design changes on this feedback." Nice.
Here, those 18 submissions, which are eye-opening, to say the least. If one thing is for sure across the globe, it's that there's no such thing as one definition of gorgeous.

U.S.
Superdrug researchers ran a brief survey with a 35-person sample and, assuming a height 5'4"-ish, asked participants to guess the weight of the woman in each Photoshopped image. That said, a woman with this ideal U.S. body type would weigh about 128 pounds. 
votar

Es racismo, y no sólo discriminación - It is racism, not just discrimination


Ha surgido una corriente, especialmente activa en determinados sitios de internet, que pretende denunciar el racismo antiblanco pero obviando el término racismo y sustituyéndolo por el de discriminación, hablando así de “discriminación antiblanca”. Argumentan sus seguidores que la palabra racismo es desaconsejable por “incluir terminología antiblanca”. Se hace referencia con esto, al parecer, al desarrollo del concepto de racismo por parte de la Teoría Crítica de la Escuela de Frankfort. 

Aún en el caso de que esto sea exactamente así, no me parece un motivo suficiente para renunciar al uso del término racismo antiblanco en nuestro discurso. En primer lugar, es muy útil poner al servicio de nuestra lucha las connotaciones que acompañan a la expresión racismo, y de las que carece la palabra discriminación. Además, racismo es un término con mucha mayor carga semántica que discriminación. En segundo lugar, discriminación es un vocablo un tanto vago, especialmente hoy, pues aunque sigue predominando su significado negativo, tiene otro de naturaleza positiva, como cuando se dice “discriminación positiva”, por ejemplo. Racismo, sin embargo, es un término unívocamente negativo a un nivel general, excelente para denunciar lo que aquí deseamos denunciar. 

Tanto es así que nosotros nos hemos visto forzados a inventar otro, “racialismo”, para expresar el orgullo racial propio sin menosprecio racial ajeno. En tercer lugar, el enemigo no va a renunciar a utilizar el término racismo por el mero hecho de que nosotros lo hagamos. La conclusión discursiva de ceder el término racismo al enemigo, conocidas las connotaciones y la mayor carga semántica que contiene frente al término alternativo propuesto de discriminación, es obvia: “en determinadas circunstancias, los no blancos pueden llegar a discriminar a los blancos, pero solo los blancos son capaces de racismo (contra los no blancos, claro)”. Pero, ¿no era este infundio lo que sostenía la Teoría Crítica, que el racismo es exclusivamente un atributo de los blancos? 
votar

Saturday, December 24, 2016

DNA Proof of Racial Differences – More Facts Come to Light


John Philippe Rushton is a Canadian psychology professor widely known for his highly  controversial work on racial group differences.  In an Internet Essay in 2001: Is Race A Valid Taxonomic Construct? he argues that racial differences make sense in terms of human  evolution.  Talking of migration out of Africa  he says that the further north people went out of Africa, the harder it was to get food, shelter, make clothes, and raise children. So  the groups that evolved into today’s Whites and Orientals needed larger brains, more family stability, and a longer life.  The time and energy needed to build a bigger brain was a trade off with slower rates of growth, less aggression and less sexual activity.
He claims that this racial pattern is evident all around the world: “…on average, African-descended children are born with smaller brains than European- or East Asian-descended children…”, and concludes that “Black underachievement is not simply due to ‘White prejudice’” because they are born with smaller brains than White or East Asian children.  Rushton has provoked controversy for years and is criticised by many scientists and researchers for being poorly researched and promoting scientific racism.  Robert Sussman, an evolutionary anthropologist and editor in-chief of American Anthropologist, said of one of Rushton’s books in 1998: “This is an insidious attempt to legitimize Rushton’s racist propaganda and is tantamount to publishing ads for white supremacy…If you have any question about the validity of the ‘science’ of Rushton’s trash you should read any one of his articles and the many rebuttals by ashamed scientists.
votar

"Tengo razones para odiar a los niños": el polémico testimonio de una madre francesa que se arrepiente de haber tenido hijos


La escritora francesa Corinne Maier considera que los adultos están tan obsesionados con sus hijos, y tan exhaustos por tener que cuidarlos, que no tienen energía para nada más.

¡Es horrible: somos muchos! El planeta Tierra tiene una población humana de 7.500 millones de individuos. En el año 2100 seremos 11.000 millones ¿Cómo podrán alimentarse todas esas personas?
Frente a esta tendencia, los medios de comunicación están mostrando por primera vez algo de preocupación (incluso en Francia, un país promotor de políticas a favor de la natalidad y donde los medios de comunicación están definitivamente a favor de los nacimientos).
Vivimos en una sociedad obsesionada con los niños. Un hijo es considerado garantía de felicidad, desarrollo personal e incluso status social.
A aquellos que no son padres o madres se les describe como egoístas. Están bajo sospecha de ser malos ciudadanos. Muchos de ellos sienten la presión de justificarse: "No puedo tener ninguno, pero amo a los niños".
Ante lo cual yo me apresuro a añadir, solo para ponerle picante a la conversación: "Tengo algunos, pero también tengo razones para odiar a los niños".
votar

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Are the features we see in indigenous Africans proof of evolution since apes and homo sapiens originated from the continent?


I'm gonna try to pretend that this is a serious question, rather than just somebody looking for confirmation of their racism.

The problem here is a classic case of confirmation bias. You sought out "African" features that looked ape-like to you, but (to be blunt) that's wildly wrong about both apes and Africans. And more to the point, you didn't look further to see what features other "races" have that also look like the apes.

For example: under the fur, most chimpanzees have pale skin rather than dark skin. Dark skin is an adaptation for Africans, and if we're totting up differences that makes them "more advanced" than pale skin.



Similarly, most Africans are not especially hairy. (More on that in a second.) Some African men don't grow beards at all. Apes have full body hair, a trait they share with more with "Caucasians" than with most "Africans". You'll also not that the ape's hair is fairly straight, more like a "Caucasian's" than the classically frizzy hair of an "African".

And that's the rub: they may all look alike to you, but even the highly racist 19th century ethnographers wouldn't think to lump all of "Africans" together. I put the racial terms in scare quotes because they're not used any more; they are remnants of badly oversimplified racial stereotypes.  TH Huxley, for example, attributed 5 different races to Africa (Bushmen, Africoid, Negrito, Melanochroi, Xanthochroi; plus the Australoids that most people would surely see as "black"). The African continent has more diversity than the others, because people have been living and evolving there longer. The same continent brings us both the shortest people in the world (Pygmies, under 5 foot) and some of the tallest (the Dinka). They diverge more from the "apes" than groups with less diversity.

votar

La Raza Aria, El Espíritu Hiperboreo Y La Inmortalidad


La espiritualidad hiperbórea se plasma sobre la raza aria biológica.
Esta espiritualidad hiperbórea expresada por la raza aria se caracteriza por el dominio de uno mismo en la virtud, el autodominio, el sentido de honor y justicia, la tendencia hacia la verticalidad y el orden, el respeto a la naturaleza y a los árboles ancestrales, así como también el trabajo sobre la naturaleza para poder construir un hogar, una Patria limpia y saludable donde desarrollar la raza con dignidad. El ario trabaja la Fuerza y fortalece el músculo para ser firme y digno y extender la salud física, la vida saludable... También trabaja la mente y la inteligencia para obrar sobre la naturaleza y transformarla y así crea “paraísos” sobre la tierra donde la ley de la muerte del mundo es vencida y subyugada.

Contrariamente a los cultos de adoración que buscan el favor de los demonios como el vudú y otras deidades como Jehová, la espiritualidad hiperbórea no busca ni ejerce violencia gratuita contra ningún ser sino tan sólo la necesaria para el desarrollo y la salvaguarda de su estirpe.
Como tal, la raza aria “humana” desarrolla de forma natural una espiritualidad hiperbórea. El judío se infiltró en el mundo ario desdibujándolo y cubriéndolo mediante la inmundicia judeocristiana: el Vaticano, la “Iglesia de Roma”, el “catolicismo”.

En sí misma, la raza aria es un ser animal -y por lo tanto caído o encarnado en este mundo de muerte- que recoge en su naturaleza biológica el reflejo de una luz espiritual que alumbra toda su estirpe de forma natural y que, desarrollado sobre la arquitectura de los edificios, es el mismo espíritu que recoge para luego transmitir y manifestar la catedral gótica. 

El gótico se desarrolló en Europa cuando los pueblos nórdicos fueron “integrados” o pervertidos por el judeocristianismo... pero en sus catedrales de líneas estilizadas, limpias y nórdicas encontramos un conocimiento y toda una ciencia hiperbórea mágica. (Para quien esté interesado sobre el espíritu del arte gótico recomiendo leer Alfred Rosenberg: “El Mito del Siglo XX”, Capítulo III.2 –Arquitectura griega y gótica)
votar

The Likely Persistence of a White Majority

How Census Bureau statistics have misled thinking about the American future


as the notion of demography as destiny ever enjoyed so much credence? The disappearance of a white majority in the United States by the middle of this century is now widely accepted as if it were an established fact. Projections by the Census Bureau have encouraged those expectations, and people on both the right and left have seized on them in support of their views. On the right, the anxieties about the end of white majority status have fueled a conservative backlash against the growing diversity of the country. On the left, many progressives anticipate an inexorable change in the ethno-racial power hierarchy. Numerous sites on the web offer advice and counsel on how whites can handle their imminent minority status.
But what if these different reactions are based on a false premise—actually two false premises? The first stems from the Census Bureau’s way of classifying people by ethnicity and race, which produces the smallest possible estimate of the size of the non-Hispanic white population. Whenever there is ambiguity about ethno-racial identity, the statistics publicized by the bureau count an individual as minority. This statistical choice is particularly important for population projections because of the growing number of children from mixed families, most of whom have one white parent and one from a minority group. In the Census Bureau’s projections, children with one Hispanic, Asian, or black parent are counted as minority (that is, as Hispanic or nonwhite). The United States has historically followed a “one-drop” rule in classifying people with any black ancestry as black. The census projections, in effect, extend the one-drop rule to the descendants of other mixed families. A great deal of evidence shows, however, that many children growing up today in mixed families are integrating into a still largely white mainstream society and likely to think of themselves as part of that mainstream, rather than as minorities excluded from it.
votar

El comediante Stephen Colbert crea polémica por tuit "racista"

El comediante estadounidense Stephen Colbert se vio envuelto en una polémica después de que se publicara en la cuenta de Twitter de su programa "The Colbert Report" un mensaje que ha sido considerado racista para con la comunidad asiática.
La ira de los internautas hizo que el hashtag #CancelColbert se haya convertido en el principal trending topic de Twitter en Estados Unidos en las últimas horas.
La controversia surgió a raíz de que el humorista se burlara en un segmento de su programa emitido el miércoles del dueño del equipo de fútbol americano de los Red Skins, después de que este anunciara que creó la Fundación Washington Redskins para los Americanos Originales, con la que estaría respondiendo a las críticas al equipo por utilizar el término "red skin" (piel roja), considerado ofensivo.
Colbert se burló de esta noticia y dijo que él también pensaba abrir la fundación “Ching-Chong Ding-Dong” para mostrar su solidaridad con la comunidad asiática.

Confusión


Después del programa, en la cuenta de Twitter de “The Colbert Report” se publicó un tuit recogiendo la broma del comediante, pero fuera de contexto.
“Estoy dispuesto a mostrarle a la comunidad #asiática que me importan con la Fundación Ching-Chong Ding-Dong para la Sensibilidad para los Orientales o lo que sea", se podía leer en el mensaje.
votar

Saturday, December 10, 2016

USA: Non-White babies now outnumbers the White birth rate


White babies are now outnumbered by 'minority' babies, according to new population estimates from the Census Bureau.

Racial and ethnic babies made up 50.2% of all babies born in the USA in 2015. Last year, 1,995,102 minority babies were born, just slightly more than the 1,982,936 White babies born.

The USA is on track to have a non-White majority (be a White minority) by around 2044. Probably sooner, depending on how quickly the traitors in the White House import 3rd world'ers.

On one hand you'll have the bleeding heart idealists saying: So, what's the problem? On the other hand you'll have the race realists feeling deflated at how their own leaders have sold the country out.

Unfortunately, common sense has left the building. Actually, that building has burned down long ago. 

For the most part, politicians are the weakest and weaselish people and suffer from severe cases of idealism. These delusional dolts think they are so powerful and important, that their legacy will change the future of the world. Most politicians are not there to represent the will of the people, but to represent their will over the people.

votar

¿Te parece racista esta foto publicitaria de Gap?

¿Qué ves en esta fotografía?
¿Cuatro amiguitas posando juguetonamente frente a la cámara? ¿Otra poco memorable campaña de mercadeo?, ¿o un patente ejemplo del tipo de racismo latente que persiste en el mundo corporativo de Estados Unidos?
Ese es el debate que se ha desatado en las redes sociales en respuesta a la publicidad de una nueva línea de ropa; una colaboración entre la empresa Gap y la cómica y presentadora de televisión Ellen DeGeneres.
La propaganda gráfica ha provocado una crítica tan punzante que la compañía de ropa ha pedido disculpas y anunció que retiraría la imagen de su campaña.
La niña blanca alta con su brazo recostado sobre la cabeza de una niña negra de menor estatura es lo que ha encendido la polémica.
Para algunos ha resultado por lo menos insultante, si no intencionalmente racista, y dicen refleja la falta de consideración por parte de Gap.
"Gracias por ilustrar perfectamente cómo es el 'racismo latente' en los medios tradicionales. Ella NO es tu reposabrazos", reza uno de los mensajes en Twitter.

votar

Saturday, December 3, 2016

Ethnic Hegemonies in American History, Part 1

Political Philosophy and Human Genetic Diversity
Western political philosophy tends toward moral and political universalism: the idea that norms are valid for all human beings. This presupposes either that human beings are biologically pretty much the same, or that human biodiversity is irrelevant to moral and political issues. Nevertheless, Western political philosophers initially limited their conclusions to ethnically homogeneous regions they knew and understood. Plato’s Republic, for example, portrays an ideal society for Greeks, not barbarians, and even well past the Enlightenment John Stuart Mill explicitly excluded many non-Europeans from his conclusions in On Liberty.[1]
Plato and Mill were prescient to do so. Few pre-modern people could travel widely. Consequently most people they knew were much like themselves. But during the Age of Discovery, which started at the end of the fifteenth century, European voyages throughout the world encountered the full richness of Earth’s botanical, zoological, and anthropological diversity, and efforts to understand it contributed to the seventeenth century’s Scientific Revolution.
By 1735, in the Enlightenment’s full flower, Sweden’s Carl Linnaeus developed the system still used to classify Earth’s biodiversity. He observed significant morphological differences between the human populations of the different continents, which led him classify these groups as distinct species.[2] Such human populations are now called races.
The great controversy of our time rages between those who acknowledge or deny the existence of distinct races. The race deniers are motivated by the conflict between human biodiversity and philosophical or religious forms of universalism. Nevertheless, the study of human diversity remained mainstream science until it was purged and proscribed for political reasons in the mid-twentieth century.[3] This is hardly the first effort to censor inconvenient scientific truths. The Catholic Church’s temporary suppression of heliocentric cosmology is only the most notorious example among many.
votar

Ethnic Hegemonies in American History, Part 2

The First World War and the Great Depression
In 1912 Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, became president for eight years when regular and Progressive Republicans split. Wilson’s roots were northern Scots-Irish, but he experienced the South’s brutal invasion by northern troops as a child and worked in Greater New England-dominated academic culture as an adult. Consequently his sympathies were more with English-descended northern and southern elites than the Scots-Irish center, and he was more a Progressive than a Populist despite his Democratic affiliation. He appreciated the importance of race, however, and social separation of whites and blacks was maximal in his administration. He is most remembered for bringing America into World War I despite a peace platform, which was largely motivated by his sense of ethnic solidarity with British elites. His decision almost certainly saved the British from defeat.[1]
At the war’s end, largely Jewish-led Communist revolutions seized power briefly in Germany and Hungary and for nearly a century in Russia. None of these turned out well for Jews as a whole, however, and all generated intense anger because of indiscriminate killing of non-Jews. Their brief victory in Germany provoked an anti-Jewish revolution, ultimately causing their worst demographic disaster since Bogdan Khmelnitsky freed Ukrainians from Polish and Jewish domination in 1654. Even in Russia a wily Georgian Communist Josef Stalin broke their power by 1927. The left did not successfully revolt in the United States, however. It barely survived repression falling hardest on its rural non-Jewish former populist factions at the Wilson administration’s end. The American left has consequently persisted into the twenty-first century as a Jewish-dominated movement that would otherwise be scarcely recognizable to its post-World War I activists.[2]
In 1921 Greater New England Republicans returned to power in a landslide made possible by millions of previously politically inert German-Americans and other European immigrants in the populist heartland who had been angered by the war against their ethnic kin in Europe and by intense government-orchestrated discrimination at home.[3] Lingering Greater New England progressivism finally ended mass immigration and brought ethnic stability, but financial excess led to economic disaster in 1929.[4] The resulting misery returned the Democrats to power for another twenty years.
votar

Indianismo


INDIANISMO en America


A partir de la década de 1970, como respuesta al enquistado indigenismo, surge el concepto de indianista. ¿En qué sentido? Desde sus inicios, el discurso indigenista ha experimentado todas sus variaciones discursivas y conformación ideológica desde el no indígena.

Españoles, criollos y mestizos, en diversos momentos históricos, han establecido un discurso de idealización del indígena y lo indígena. Así, los grupos indígenas, o al menos investigadores y gente entusiasta, han apoyado para que se conozca la otra versión del ser indígena, su cultura y su historia: aquella que viene desde los propios indígenas. A esta tendencia en contra del indigenismo –nombre de por sí siempre cuestionado- se le denominó indianismo. Surgen entonces organizaciones indianistas e indigenas por toda la región de Americana.

En ese contexto de Marxistas, Comunistas Troskistas y Liberalismo en Bolivia, surge el indianismo de Fausto Reinaga, que le reclama al indigenismo su deseo de “asimilar” al indio y propone el indianismo como el indio y su revolución (Revolución India), además se manifiesta en contra de la tipificación de ‘indígena’ y principalmente desarrolla su teoría identificando el problema nacional como un problema de razas. Para él, la contradicción principal no es la lucha de clases, sino la ‘lucha de razas’, la oposición del indio y del occidente.
votar